<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Running To Lose Weight &#187; Running For Weight Loss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.runningtoloseweight.net/tag/running-for-weight-loss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.runningtoloseweight.net</link>
	<description>A Running Resource For The Non-Runner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 06:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Who Else Wants To Say GOODBYE To Long-Distance Running&#8230; For Once And For All?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.runningtoloseweight.net/running-for-weight-loss/</link>
		<comments>http://www.runningtoloseweight.net/running-for-weight-loss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 23:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Running To Lose Weight</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Running For Weight Loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.runningtoloseweight.net/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you want to start running to lose weight, but you&#8217;re wondering whether running a few miles per 60-minute workout is really the most efficient way to lose weight. And since you&#8217;re pretty new to this, you&#8217;re pretty positive that a 45 to 60 minute continuous run is murder on your lungs and legs. Hell, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you want to start <strong><a href="http://www.runningtoloseweight.net/the-hightensity-sessions-report">running to lose weight</a></strong>, but you&#8217;re wondering whether running a few miles per 60-minute workout is really the most efficient way to lose weight.</p>
<p>And since you&#8217;re pretty new to this, you&#8217;re pretty positive that a 45 to 60 minute continuous run is murder on your lungs and legs. Hell, you don&#8217;t even know if you could run for five minutes straight without stopping!</p>
<p>While most books recommend going for a rigorous, tedious workout such as this, these books were written by personal fitness instructors and were mostly meant for athletes and those who want to run marathons.</p>
<p>But what about those of us who just want to lose weight but just <strong>DO NOT HAVE</strong> a couple spare hours everyday to dedicate to running and working out?</p>
<p><em>Is it REALLY possible to lean down to our ideal weights without running for what seems to be hours on end?</em></p>
<p><em>Can beginners who can&#8217;t run for very long REALLY tone down and lose weight without taking on a workout meant for those training to run a marathon?</em></p>
<p>What if I tell you that <strong>yes, it&#8217;s VERY POSSIBLE to lose weight</strong> from a program that starts out with running for <span style="text-decoration: underline;">as little as 3 times a week</span> as long as you follow this important rule rarely talked about in the fitness circles?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>You can find out the #1 secret to time-efficient workouts that most fitness experts know, but would never dream of telling you </strong><strong>about, </strong><strong>by reading <a href="http://www.runningtoloseweight.net/the-hightensity-sessions-report/">this FREE report</a>.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.runningtoloseweight.net/running-for-weight-loss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
